X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00800000
X-Mozilla-Keys:                                                                                 
Message-ID: <547762EB.9000702@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:44:11 -0800
From: Richard Childers <fscked@sbcglobal.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/10.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jessica.ppmrentals@gmail.com
CC: Bill Dobberstein <BDobberstein@ci.fortuna.ca.us>
Subject: Richard Henson: Registered Sex Offender?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jessica,


Maybe a year or two ago I heard some gossip about Richard Henson being 
arrested for rape.

I asked Richard Henson, the next time I saw him, if this was true - and 
he sheepishly told me something that seemed to add up to him being 
seduced by the daughter of one of the tenants and it all being a setup 
to extort rent.

The way I heard it from another source - I don't remember exactly who - 
was that he had offered, as the manager, to trade a month's rent, for 
sex with the tenant's daughter - and that the mother-and-daughter pair 
had afterwards reneged upon the deal.

I tend to be slow to process some things because I am trying to avoid 
leaping to conclusions. There are two sides to every he-said-she-said 
story. Sometimes more; there's the inside, too. I've been on the 
receiving end of derogatory gossip. You can't always trust the 
messenger. Etc.

But, what with him talking about sticking his dick in my wife's mouth 
(almost direct quote from SMS text provided as photographic exhibit to 
Humboldt County Superior Court) ... and my having four daughters ... and 
the judge being OK with him parking his car here and going in through a 
door, just five feet away from my front door, whenever he wants ...

.. this story comes to mind.

  Because I don't think it's fictional.


I think what also brings it to mind is Richard Henson's repeated use of 
the word "child molester", in his acrimonious exchanges with me (see 
previous email with attached audio recording). His crowd have also used 
the term against my brother. They even called the police and reported 
that my brother was a molester - pretending that they didn't know my 
brother, and that he was a stranger.

I have mulled over the attraction of this term, 'child molester', to 
them - and its source.

And suddenly, it came to me - ermagard, Richard Henson is TALKING ABOUT 
HIMSELF - an insight that I owe to Paulie, your maintenance man, who 
pointed this out when I was quoting some of the other outrageous things 
Richard Henson was saying about me, in his SMS texts.

I'm guessing that others have called Richard Henson a "child molester" 
.. and the effect this has upon him is so devastating, that he has 
begun using it, first, anticipatorily - before it can be used against him.

Unfortunately, I can't prove this, objectively. We're in the land of 
abnormal psychology, after all. And the State of California has stopped 
cooperating.

That is, Megan's Law seems to have been slightly modified ... and those 
found guilty of MISDEMEANOR sexual contact with a minor, IE, a child, 16 
or 17 years old, can now - according to the website - file a form, and 
request their removal from the Megan's Law website.

So law enforcement still knows they are predators ... but the public - 
IE, future employers of Richard Henson, perhaps as an apartment manager 
- do not.

And I'm guessing that Richard's sexual contact with was a 
16-to-17-year-old ... and Richard has filed one of those forms.

Because he doesn't show up.

And ... I'm not sure about this ... but I might have looked him up, 
after I heard this rumor, and seen that, yes, he WAS listed ... which 
would have naturally led to the  next step, asking him what his side of 
the story was - which, as described above ... I did.

So let me say ... he doesn't show up ANY MORE.

But I think he did ... once upon a time, when the laws were different.


Now, suggesting that someone is a sexual predator, without evidence, is 
a dangerous business.

And so I assure you that I would not put this in writing if I did not 
have strong reason to think it was true - even if I cannot prove it.

I thought I'd share this information, in the hopes it would help form 
some conclusions that might result in tangible actions on the part of 
the property's owner and/or management.

I would be seriously disappointed if Sylvia had not already heard this 
rumor, herself.


Whatever happened to the day when the owner or manager could just say, 
discreetly, yet firmly ... 'he's not welcome on the property'?


Regards,

~richard