X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00800000 X-Mozilla-Keys: Message-ID: <5461548B.2040406@sbcglobal.net> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:12:59 -0800 From: Richard Childers User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Erler , Bill Dobberstein Subject: Humboldt County Superior Court: We Don't See Any Reason To Issue A TRO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Couldn't make this up if I tried. The judge seemed to think it was a criminal trial. Kept on saying there was "no proof" that Richard Henson had attacked me or damaged my vehicle. I agree with the latter statement, but it's hard to believe that statements about Richard Henson's penis and my wife's mouth belong in the same sentence. Henson presented a mishmash of printed-out text messages, but nothing he'd actually submitted to the police, and I did not actually receive a copy, so I wasn't even able to respond or to inspect the document to see what had been included or excluded, and in what order. It boggles my mind. Why even bother asking for evidence if it's just going to be ignored? I told them we'd be back.