While Humboldt County's current leadership plays legal dodgeball, ducking and weaving and scheming to avoid getting hit by possible embezzlement charges or prison, against the fearsome team of Karen Paz-Dominguez, and her wily crew of auditors and truth-tellers, ... important things are happening, right here, right now, that probably transcend national boundaries.
The COVID vaccinations have been a topic of heated discussion for two years now. One thing that has puzzled and disturbed a lot of people has been the discovery that the vaccines contained graphene oxide, which spontaneously forms monomolecular sheets of graphene, which are electrically conductive, and also deliver extremely sharp microscopic cutting edges.
In this article we will show you how to determine if you seem to have been injected with the equivalent of an RFID tag ... how to audit your own Bluetooth transmissions ... and how to prove, to your own satisfaction, that they are coming from inside your body, so you don't need to rely on us.
Some people may not respond well to learning that they have been infested by nanotechnology without their knowledge or approval. But denial is only the first step on the path forward. We share this information to help everyone move forward, towards a solution.
We start with the observation that thousands of scientists around the world have verified that at least some if not all of the COVID vaccines being deployed to the public did not appear to contain just mRNA material.
Next, we move to the observation that many people have reported seeing, in microscopes, what appear to be rectilinear, self-assembling structures developing in people's bloodstreams, after receiving the COVID vaccines. Some have compared these structures to antennas.
Third, we share the observation that many people are reporting that after receiving a COVID vaccine, they began detecting unusual Bluetooth broadcast IDs in their vicinity.
Theory
What do we mean when we say unusual Bluetooth broadcast IDs?
(Your humble author has been administering Ethernet and TCP/IP networks since 1986, and has been a licensed amateur radio operator since 2000. What follows is kindergarten-level network administrator information.)
Bluetooth broadcast IDs appear to be identical to pre-existing Ethernet IDs, in that they are formed of twelve hexadecimal digits, presented in six pairs of digits, separated by colons, like this: 00:11:22:33:44:55:66, but because they are hexadecimal digits, it might be more like: 12:34:56:AB:CD:EF.
As in Ethernet, the first three pairs of hexadecimal digits are used to identify the manufacturer, and the last three pairs of hexadecimal digits are used to provide a unique identification to the device.
The vendors of networking equipment apply to a central authority to receive their three-hexadecimal-digit prefix, and the central authority publishes the contents of their database, so that everyone can see, by looking at the first three pairs of hexadecimal digits embedded in an Ethernet or Bluetooth ID, the manufacturer of the equipment, which makes it somewhat easier to locate the equipment in question when it is wireless.
And so when one encounters an Ethernet or Bluetooth ID that does not correspond to one of the entries in the database of well-known manufacturers ... this commands attention.
Even more disturbing is to encounter these vendorless Bluetooth IDs in environments where there are no other devices or people - just you, the auditor of mysterious wireless signals.
That is what is happening today, right now, probably in your own house.
Why? Where are they coming from? Buckle up. We are going to tell you what we think. You won't like it.
Applications
What would be the purpose of tricking everyone into allowing themselves to be injected with the equivalent of an RFID tag?
One interesting application for these Bluetooth IDs might be 'smart' locks that only open to the touch of certain people's hands. That's great if you're on the whitelist, but not so wonderful if you're on the blacklist. It would be like living in the reality shown in the movie, GATTACA. But there would be no need for blood samples or DNA tests. More on that, below.
Another possible application for these Bluetooth IDs would be identifying bodies. Depending upon how long the Bluetooth tags remain active and how many Bluetooth tags are actually in circulation inside the average human's body - and how long they remain in operation after death - one might be able to identify body parts or even individual organs ... just like any other asset-tagging system.
Scared, yet? It gets worse.
Practice
We have been reading these articles on the Internet, that mentioned COVID vaccines, and Bluetooth, for a few weeks. A few days ago, we saw another one, and the author had four specific pieces of software he recommended installing, with which to analyze Bluetooth packets.
We had made a note to install a Bluetooth analyzer, and see if the rumors were true - but when we returned to that page, we found only an announcement that the account had been suspended.
So we opened up our phone's Android Play Store app and looked for Bluetooth analyzers. We ended up installing four Bluetooth apps, for purposes of comparison.
The best of the four turned out to be something called 'BLE Analyser', by Keuwlsoft - it says it is designed for low-power Bluetooth emissions, which, it turns out, is exactly what we needed. It also has a very engineer-friendly, easy-to-use interface.
We decided to scan ourselves, first, to establish a baseline.
As someone who has been working in the software field for forty years and who has watched the whole antivirus industry be born and grow into a devouring monster, we knew the people in charge of things couldn't even stop computer viruses, and so, quite bluntly, there was no fucking way The Powers That Be could come up with an effective vaccine for a brand new virus, based upon updating our DNA (our operating systems are much more complicated than Microsoft Windows), in just a few months. Or years, for that matter.
So, declining to be a test subject for their new software-inspired, one-size-fits-all update to our totally unique DNA sequence ... we never got vaccinated against COVID.
According to what we had been reading on the Internet, because we had not been vaccinated with a COVID vaccine, we would therefore not be radiating Bluetooth packets. And the Internet was right - we do not seem to be radiating any Bluetooth frequencies.
With BLE Analyser we were able to verify that we, ourselves, were not broadcasting any Bluetooth packets. We saw no radio traffic when we were alone. We picked up an occasional Bluetooth packet from a television or a pair of headphones, probably from the apartment below, but that was all.
But when we went outside, we started picking up Bluetooth packets. We saw about as many unidentified Bluetooth broadcasting stations as we saw children playing outside. We saw a few more Bluetooth devices. But most of the Bluetooth packets the BLE Analyser was seeing, had a '?' next to them, because BLE Analyser could not find manufacturers to match the Bluetooth IDs being broadcast - and they were in the majority.
The situation was exactly as everyone had described it to be, on the Internet.
Science
Of course, doing science involves doing a lot of simple experiments, many of them, over and over. So we took our phone with us - to the post office, where there were only two or three people in line, and only two or three Bluetooth transmitters on our display, and to the local grocery store, where there were many people, and many unidentified Bluetooth transmitters, and then back home, where, once again, there were no Bluetooth transmissions, once we closed the door.
Science also involves sharing one's results with other researchers and asking them to do the same experiment, to see if they get the same results.
So we ask you, gentle reader, to install BLE Analyser on your cellphone ... scan yourself, when you are alone, in the middle of an empty parking lot, and, if you find that you seem to have a Bluetooth ID, then, write it down, and start watching for that ID. If that ID is coming from inside your body, and you are holding your phone, then the signal associated with that ID should be the strongest signal you see, at all times.
Now, under those same circumstances of strict isolation and distance from other people, cars, and objects ... scan others, one at a time, see if they have Bluetooth IDs, and record them, similarly. Ask them to install the software on their phones and to scan themselves. Compare the numbers you record for each other. If you both find that you are both observing the same Bluetooth IDs for the same individuals, then that is good evidence that this hypothesis is correct.
According to Wikipedia, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) has a maximum range of around 100 yards - so that is how far away from other objects you need to be, to do this test. Out in the middle of a baseball diamond or a soccer field or an empty parking lot would be perfect.
According to Wikipedia, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) requires between 10 and 15 milliwatts to operate. It's not clear where this electrical energy might be coming from. One is tempted to draw parallels between this, and the scene, in the movie, The Matrix, where Neo takes the red pill, and wakes up - but let us not be hasty.
It is likely that this is an even lower-power form of Bluetooth; the protocol appears to be undergoing considerable extension from its original use and there may be a passive mode of Bluetooth that gets its energy from radio waves, as is used in passive RFID tags.
That's all we can do, right now - record data for future analysis. We are dealing with something brand new. We need to be able to describe what it is that we are observing before we, as a society, can discuss solutions.
Future
We wondered: where do these numbers forming the Bluetooth IDs come from? Are they generated randomly? Just how reliably unique are these IDs? If they are not unique, they are useless for identification, security, or population control.
If each human being so injected with a vaccine containing the ingredients for self-assembling, Bluetooth-radiating nanostructures, is a host for dozens, or hundreds of these nanodevices ... why do we not see dozens, or hundreds, of anonymous Bluetooth IDs?
Did each injection contain the ingredients for one and only one nanostructure?
Or do multiple nanostructures exist, and communicate, to insure that they all broadcast the same ID?
Or do these hypothetical multiple nanostructures all derive their Bluetooth IDs from a common point of reference, that is guaranteed to be unique: for instance, the DNA of the host?
From our time working in the bioinformatics industry, at Roche, we know that DNA is now being represented and stored as extremely long sequences of binary digits.
From our own experience in the bioinformatics industry we think that it is possible that these Bluetooth IDs express some portion of the host's DNA.
This raises some even more interesting questions.
Is the person's gender represented as one of those binary digits in one of those hexadecimal numbers? Further analysis would be required. Transgender activists should be agitated about this possibility - as we all know, now, gender is actually a social construct and has nothing to do with your DNA. </sarcasm>
Are specific portions of a person's genetic inheritance expressed as one of those binary digits in one of those hexadecimal numbers? For instance, those with the Y-chromosomal Aaron, or so-called 'Cohen', gene, might have a '1' at the reserved location; those without, get a '0' in that location.
One can easily see how such tagging mechanisms would quickly be abused.
Unintentionally, The Powers That Be may have just given everyone who questions authority, a foolproof way for us all to recognize one another. Purebloods, unite!
Food for thought.